Galloway is a Sanctimonious Liar. Period.

As everyone no doubt knows by now, Gorgeous George Galloway is a big fat sanctimonious liar. He has lied to the media, to his consituents, to his country at large, and to the American Senate. Given their inability to tolerate liars in any form, leftist websites are right now demanding a full investigation and screaming for Galloway's resignation and criminal prosecution.

Ya...right.

Senator Norm Coleman, in charge of the only quality investigation into OFF and a proud former Democrat from the great state of Minnesota, is on Galloway like a peace protestor on a bong. Here's his press release on the subject. Those interested can find the link to the full report (pdf) at the bottom of the release.

Coleman brought NHL hockey back to the Twin Cities. He secured The Wild and the premier NHL facility in the nation. That already qualified him for "I'd be your bitch" status. If he were to take down Galloway and the entire crooked bunch at the U.N., I don't know what I could even offer him. He already has my virtue.

Incidentally, after having to suffer through a tedious and hysterical Galloway in his so-called debate with the obsequious asshole, it looks like Christopher Hitchens gets the last word, and laugh, after all. I think I'll let him have it.

For George Galloway, however, the war would seem to be over. The evidence presented suggests that he lied in court when he sued the Daily Telegraph in London over similar allegations (and collected money for that, too). It suggests that he lied to the Senate under oath. And it suggests that he made a deceptive statement in the register of interests held by members of the British House of Commons. All in all, a bad week for him, especially coming as it does on the heels of the U.N. report on the murder of Rafik Hariri, which appears to pin the convict's badge on senior members of the Assad despotism in Damascus, Galloway's default patron after he lost his main ally in Baghdad.

Yet this is the man who received wall-to-wall good press for insulting the Senate subcommittee in May, and who was later the subject of a fawning puff piece in the New York Times, and who was lionized by the anti-war movement when he came on a mendacious and demagogic tour of the country last month. I wonder if any of those who furnished him a platform will now have the grace to admit that they were hosting a man who is not just a pimp for fascism but one of its prostitutes as well.