Friday, June 03, 2005

Welcome to Team Base!

Gary, you need a montage.

Spottswoode, you know what to do.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I see your good at writing comments, why dont you write something worth reading, some substance that is if you know what that is.

Armand said...

Non,

Substance compared to what?

You'll find more here than you will on (your home site, probably?) The Blue Voice.

Are you truly too cowardly to comment with something better than "anonymous?"

Anonymous said...

Blue Voice you say? Sorry but I am not familiar with that site. Take the time to write something besides the one post that I see that barely holds any interest. Instead of taking the time to call names. And as far as writing I have more of what it takes. So stop with coward and lets see what you got.

Armand said...

Non,

Of course you "aren't familiar" with Blue Voice. You and your friends have written only a couple entries, which you have deleted.

As I've already stated, we will write on our schedule and not on yours.

It's interesting that you suggest you have more of what it takes to be a writer when you show up with such simple grammatical errors as "your" (you're), "is'nt" (isn't), and spelling errors like "Intriguiging" (intriguing).

Oddly enough, it seems the only one flattered by your "skill" is yourself. What's even better is that you suggest the one post holds no interest, but you own - what, six of the 14 comments on this page?

You really /should/ think before you embarass yourself like that.

Then again, this is precisely why you hide behind "anonymous."

If you're (not "your") not intrigued or interested in what is or what is not-yet posted here, you are free to go at any time. The only one holding you captive is yourself.

Anonymous said...

If you notice the six comments, were in reply to your comments there is no mention about your post in any of these comments, and just because someone decides to remain anonymous does not make them a coward.

Anonymous said...

One more thing just because someone makes grammical errors does not ensue embarrassment

Armand said...

Non,

But you said we weren't holding your interest. Were you lying?

You're right, persistent "grammical" (you meant "grammatical") errors do not necessarily mean the author would be embarrassed. That would require the author to actually take pride in their work.

Thanks again for the comic relief! With your quality of commentary, even our most basic writers are going to seem like geniuses.